New York City’s congestion pricing plan, set to begin Jan. 5, 2025, is under fire from nine lawsuits filed by unions, state governments and advocacy groups. Opponents argue the tolls are unfair, financially burdensome and lack proper environmental review.
Supporters claim the plan is essential for reducing traffic, cutting pollution and modernizing public transit.
New Jersey, led by Gov. Phil Murphy, D, has filed a prominent lawsuit alleging that the tolls unfairly target New Jersey commuters. Other groups opposing the plan include the Trucking Association of New York, a group of Long Island leaders and the coalition of New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, who all claim the fees are economically damaging and illegal.
The congestion pricing plan charges $9 during peak hours for vehicles entering Manhattan south of 60th Street, with higher fees for trucks and discounts during off-peak hours. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority said the tolls will generate $15 billion to fund subway upgrades, electric buses and other transit improvements.
Advocates argue the plan will cut gridlock and improve air quality in heavily polluted neighborhoods, while critics contend the costs disproportionately harm working-class families and suburban commuters.
Gov. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y., said the reduced toll amount of $9, down from the originally proposed $15, balances the need for revenue with affordability. She and MTA officials insist the plan is vital to the city’s future. However, opponents said the financial strain and legal questions make it unworkable.
With court battles ahead and a pending vote by the MTA board, the fate of the plan remains uncertain.
