Vice President Kamala Harris is facing plagiarism accusations related to a book she coauthored in 2009, with the claims coming just three weeks before the presidential election. Conservative activist Christopher Rufo first reported the allegations, highlighting them in his article titled “Kamala Harris’s Plagiarism Problem.”
Right-leaning outlets like Fox News and the New York Post, along with left-leaning outlets such as CNN and The New York Times, have all reported on the accusations. However, the seriousness of the plagiarism claims varies depending on the source.
Fox News emphasizes “27 instances of plagiarism” in Harris’ book in the article’s subheadline, while The New York Times’ subheadline highlights a plagiarism expert stating, “the lapses were not serious.”
Rufo’s reporting is based on an analysis by Austrian professor Stefan Weber, a self-proclaimed “plagiarism hunter.” Weber alleges there are 24 instances of plagiarized work from other authors and three cases of self-plagiarism.
Rufo published some of Weber’s findings on X, comparing sections of the book’s text to reports from The Associated Press and a press release from John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
EXCLUSIVE: Kamala Harris plagiarized at least a dozen sections of her criminal-justice book, Smart on Crime, according to a new investigation. The current vice president even lifted material from Wikipedia.
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 14, 2024
We have the receipts. 🧵
He also compared text from the book to Wikipedia entries prior to the book’s publication and to documents from the Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Urban Institute.
Harris’ campaign has dismissed the allegations.
“Rightwing operatives are getting desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election,” the Harris campaign said in a statement. “This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the Vice President clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout.”
The extent of those citations and the definition of plagiarism differ among news reports.
The New York Post noted, “In at least two of the instances, the source of the original verbiage is cited in footnotes; however, quotation marks are not around the apparently copied words, and in other instances, passages appear to be wholly uncredited, such as the Urban Institute report.”
Fox News reported that it “independently verified that Harris’ book features verbatim and near-verbatim reproductions.”
The New York Times stated, “In a review of the book, The New York Times found that none of the passages in question took the ideas or thoughts of another writer, which is considered the most serious form of plagiarism.”
It added that the cited passages were taken from published work without quotation marks.
CNN reviewed several passages highlighted by Rufo and found that Harris and coauthor O’C. Hamilton failed to properly attribute language to their sources.
Experts told CNN that using someone else’s work without giving appropriate credit is considered plagiarism, even if the original sources are cited.